Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 F.1d 883 - Tuck v. Olds

Tuck v. Olds’s Empirical Analysis

29 F. 883 · 1886

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
October 1993
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 1993

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

60188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Bank v. Matthews · Reynolds v. First Nat Bank of Crawfordsville Indiana · National Bank v. Whitney · Fortier v. New Orleans Nat Bank New Orleans Nat Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is probable that the statutory provision was intended to provide for compensation in cases where depositions are taken bene esse, and in such other eases, not within the scope of the ordinary method of taking testimony in cases pending in the federal courts, as may arise.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.