Prymer v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis
29 F.3d 1208 · 1994
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Knox v. State of Indiana (1996), Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo (1995)
33 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Castor v. United States · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The plain error doctrine may be available to review evidentiary rulings to which no objection was made at trial if a moving party can demonstrate (1) that exceptional circumstances exist, (2) that substantial rights are affected, and (3) that a miscarriage of justice will result if the doctrine is not applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[I]t is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.