Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 F.3d 137 - Tyger Construction Company Incorporated v. Pensacola Construction Company Tyger Construction Company Incorporated

Tyger Construction Company Incorporated v. Pensacola Construction Company Tyger Construction Company Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis

29 F.3d 137 · 1994

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Smith v. Virginia Commonwealth University (1996), ZF Meritor, LLC v. Eaton Corp. (2012)

11 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

190199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kahm v. United States · Rivera v. United States · Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp. · United States v. Baller · Persinger v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “based on assumptions which are speculative and are not supported by the record.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Scrutiny of expert testimony is especially proper where it consists of 'an array of figures conveying a delusive impression of exactness in an area where a jury's common sense is less available than usual to protect it.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`to ensure that only properly admitted evidence is considered by the jury.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.