United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
29 F.3d 175 · 1994
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States of America v. Akin Akinkoye a (1999), United States v. Bolden (2003)
43 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · United States v. Daughtrey · United States v. Innamorati · United States v. Hill · United States v. Irvin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' the defendant abused a position of public or private trust.' " Id . at 178 (quoting U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 ); see id . ("[s]uch defendant-specific language”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`the question of whether an individual occupies a position of trust should be addressed from the perspective of the victim.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“These roles in the offense provisions were designed to permit sentencing judges to make individualized distinctions among defendants engaged in a criminal enterprise. By their very nature, [they] cannot be based upon the actions of co-conspirators; for example, a defendant who was not the organizer of a criminal activity could not receive a role enhancement merely because it was reasonably foreseeable that a co-conspirator would organize a criminal scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.