Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 F.3d 345 - United States v. Wiley

United States v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis

29 F.3d 345 · 1994

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably United States v. Franklin (2001), United States v. Dowdell (2010)

23 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

190199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Olano · Doyle v. Ohio · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Gregory v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the government made repeated Doyle violations, whether any curative effort was made by the trial court, whether the defendant's exculpatory evidence is `transparently frivolous,' and whether the other evidence of the defendant's guilt is `otherwise overwhelming.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any variance did not affect his substantial rights or cause actual prejudice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was on notice before trial that the government intended to present”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.