United States v. Schiavo’s Empirical Analysis
29 F.3d 6 · 1994
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably United States v. Chhien (2001), United States v. Romain (2004)
29 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · Minnesota v. Dickerson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[S]earches and seizures conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment--subject only to a few specially established and well delineated exceptions.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]ecause Trooper Duffy did not know what the bulge was after the initial pat frisk and because he needed to conduct a further, unwarranted search of the bulge and its contents to determine what it was, the ‘plain feel’ doctrine espoused in Dickerson does not apply”); United States v. Gibson, 305 U.S.App.D.C. 246, 248 , 19 F.3d 1449, 1451 (1994) (upholding suppression of evidence where officer only could identify”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he search of one's person is more intrusive on the rights protected by the Fourth Amendment than the search of an automobile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.