29 Ga. App. 548 - Durden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2001
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crain v. United States · Blitz v. United States · Johnson v. State · American Smelting Refining Company v. People of the State of Colorado Henry a Lindsley · Durden v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘. . . did then and there unlawfully, falsely and fraudulently utter and publish as true the above-described false and fraudulent, forged and altered paper. . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Russell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.