Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 ILL 294 - Chickering v. Failes

Chickering v. Failes’s Empirical Analysis

1862

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
6
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Wadhams v. Flagler Gay (1874), Harjo v. Johnston (1940)

50 state decisions

9018621870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dawley v. Van Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the decree is affirmed, in all its parts, the controversy is at an end. In such a case, the Circuit Court has no power to allow amendments of the pleadings, or to alter or change the decree. It can only proceed to have it enforced, according to its terms and conditions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the same power over the record which it possessed before its decree or judgment was rendered,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.