¶1The reversal of this case is asked for upon-the evidence. We have carefully examined it, and do not feel *32at liberty to disturb tbe finding. The question made by the appellants, as to whether a partnership actually existed between themselves, rendering them both liable, as partners, to the appellees, is not free from doubt; but there was evidence, which taken together with the testimony that the partner, who it seems is alone responsible, himself ordered a notice of the dissolution of the firm to be published, and his own admissions, would authorize such a conclusion, if the evidence of the appellants was not believed by the judge to whom the case was submitted.
¶2The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.