¶1Information in the name- of the State, on the relation of the prosecuting attorney, against Frederick Steighley, to oust him from the office of councilman of a ward of the city of Laporte, charging him with having intruded into and usurped the same. The facts are, in every respect, similar to those in Druliner v. The State, ante, p. 308, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons given in that case.
29 Ind. 312
Steighley v. State
Decided May 15, 1868
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1868-05-15
<p>Elections. — Ballots.—This case inyolyed the same question decided in DrvMner v. The State, ante, p. 808.</p>
Decided 1868-05-15