Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 KAN 304 - Thomas v. Reynolds

Thomas v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
March 1962
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 1962

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

30188318901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the mortgagor is the party alone entitled to re'over the penalty, his rights are, of course, the only ones intended to be secured by the statute; and in support of such a statute, the reasons given by Judge Dillon as above are entirely satisfactory,””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Unsatisfied mortgages o£ record tend to affect the pecuniary standing and credit o£ the mortgagor in business circles.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.