Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 KAN 679 - Meixell v. Kirkpatrick

Meixell v. Kirkpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
6
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 1998 · most notably Fitzgerald Mallory Const Co v. Fitzgerald (1890), York v. InTrust Bank, N.A. (1998)

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

100188318901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Booth v. . Powers · Tallman v. . Bresler · Thurst v. . West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A party who denies the jurisdiction of the court over his person must first present this single question. He may not mingle with his plea to the jurisdiction other pleas which concede jurisdiction, and thereafter insist that there was error in overruling his plea to the jurisdiction."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The action was commenced in Wilson county, against Matthewson and Meixell. Matthewson was served in that county, and Meixell in Labette county. Now, if Matthewson and Meixell were improperly joined as defendants, and that fact was made to appear, and the single question of jurisdiction over Meixell presented, it may be conceded that no jurisdiction over Meixell was obtained, and that the plea to the jurisdiction should have been sustained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.