State v. Durein’s Empirical Analysis
1883
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1912
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Marchant · Cruce v. State · Stroh v. Hinchman · State v. Stoughton · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. Is a defendant in a criminal action, when tried jointly with others, entitled to the same number of peremptory challenges he would be entitled to if tried-separately, or must he share his right of challenge with his codefendant?” (p. 690.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stokley““In criminal cases a defendant, though jointly tried, is not thereby deprived of his individual right to make the full number of peremptory challenges.” (p. 692.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stokley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.