Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 KANAPP2D 489 - State v. Seibel

State v. Seibel’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State v. Gould · State v. Dubish · State v. Rucker · State v. Lumley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The notice and jury trial guarantees of the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteendr Amendment require that a factual determination resulting in an increase in the maximum prison sentence for an offense beyond die sentence established in the appropriate grid box under K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4704 be made by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.” 271 Kan. 394 , Syl. ¶ 2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.