Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Kan. App. 2d 50 - State v. Campbell

29 Kan. App. 2d 50 - State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Chambers v. Mississippi · In re Sturm · State v. Pabst · State v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Prosecutorial misconduct occurs when the county attorney fails to disclose to both the trial judge and the defense counsel that he intends to introduce into evidence a report which he failed to inform the defense counsel had been corrected. If the corrected statement changes the theory of defense as presented to the jury in opening statement, then neither admonition nor instructions by the trial judge can cure the resulting prejudice.” 238 Kan. at 99 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We hold diat a prosecutor is guilty of serious misconduct when he or she leads a defendant to believe that there is no evidence, expert or otherwise, written or oral, on a particular fact in controversy when, at the time of such representation, the prosecutor does have evidence on such fact whether in written form or otherwise and such evidence is offered and admitted at the time of the trial.” 29 Kan. App. 2d at 61 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.