Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Md. App. 161 - Sami v. Sami

29 Md. App. 161 - Sami v. Sami’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2003

6 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

701975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Roll and Scholl · Dougherty v. Dougherty · Ross v. Pick · Rethorst v. Rethorst · Courson v. Courson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the law which we must apply, we may not even consider whether the Maryland order or the Florida order may be right or may be wrong on the question of custody of the Sami children. The question has been decided by a Florida court in an order to which the courts of Maryland must extend full faith and credit. If the Florida decision is erroneous, it is subject to review on direct appeal from the Florida judgment through the Florida courts, and, if necessary, to the Supreme Court of the United States. [ 29 Md. App. at 179 ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an almost incredible history of marital warfare, with skirmishes occurring up and down the eastern seaboard of this country, as well as abroad.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.