Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 Mich. App. 285

185 N.W.2d 134

People v. Hudson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1971

Michigan Court of Appeals · decided 1971-05-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1973

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-05-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*291Churchill, J.

¶1(dissenting). I am unable to agree with the majority opinion that the defendant’s conviction should be reversed.

¶2Two men left a bar late at night. They were taken in back of the bar building by a group of men and were beaten and robbed of currency. Defendant was there. Charles Garrett testified that he saw defendant take money from the smaller of the two victims. Carolyn Page testified that she saw defendant in the scuffle. Jacob Hood testified that soon after the robbery defendant was standing near the bar and he, Hood, took money from defendant’s hand.

¶3It is not for us to weigh the testimony, but rather to determine if proof of elements of the crime alleged was presented to the jury. People v. Spann (1966), 3 Mich App 444; People v. Cunningham (1969), 20 Mich App 699. Applying this standard, I vote to affirm.

/29/michapp/285 · .json · Public domain