Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 MONT 548 - Lane v. Bailey

Lane v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
6
states following
November 1953
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 1953

23 state decisions

80190419101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowers v. Smith · People Ex Rel. Smith v. Pease · 2 E.H. Smith 142 - People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . Wood · Black v. Pate · Stackpole v. Hallahan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellate court will not reverse a judgment merely because the lower court committed error; it is only when the error has materially affected appellant's rights on the merits of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.