Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 N.C. 70

State v. . Patterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1846

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1846-12-05

This was an indictment, as above set forth, and the defendant, being convicted, moved in arrest of judgment, that the indictment contained no criminal charge. The Judge refused the motion, and the defendant appealed.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1901

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1846-12-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Daniel, J.

¶1 We think that the Judge was right, in over-ruling the motion in arrest of judgment. The indictment is (with the omission of the words, “ cursing-, swearing, quarrelling”) a copy from the precedent, to be found in 2 Chitty C. Law, 40. The defendant is charged with keeping a common ilI-g-overned and disorderly house; and for lucre, causing persons, both free and slaves, to frequent it, and there to be and remain, drinking, tippling, and misbehaving themselves, &c. to the common nuisance of all the citizens of the State, there inhabiting, passing, &c. The State might, we think, be permitted to give evidence of particular acts of misbehavior of the inmates of the house, under the above general charges; as, that they gambled, quarrelled, fought,' got drunk, made great noises, cursing and swearing, to the annoyance of the people in the neighborhood. As in an indictment for keeping a bawdy house, so in this, it is not necessary to state particulars, as the names of those who frequent the house ; but evidences of particular instances of illicit intercourse may be given under the general charge. 2 Chiity C. L. 39, 40, (note.) We are of opinion, that the indictment does charge a criminal offence. The judgment therefore, is affirmed, and this opinion must be certified.

¶2 Per Curiam. Ordered to be certified accordingly.

/29/nc/70 · .json · Public domain