Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 N.C. App. 124 - Holt v. Holt

29 N.C. App. 124 - Holt v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 168 N.C. App. 283 - Spicer v. Spicer (2005), 74 N.C. App. 231 - Atwell v. Atwell (1985)

30 state decisions

12019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crosby v. Crosby · Conrad v. Conrad · 24 N.C. App. 520 - Gibson v. Gibson · 10 N.C. App. 463 - Robinson v. Robinson · Bowes v. Bowes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an action or proceeding for the custody or support, or both, of a minor child, including a motion in the cause for the modification or revocation of an existing order for custody or support, or both, the court may in its discretion order payment of reasonable attorney’s fees to an interested party acting in good faith who has insufficient means to defray the expense of the suit. Before ordering payment of a fee in a support action, the court must find as a fact that the party ordered to furnish support has refused to provide support which is adequate under the circumstances existing at the time of the institution of the action or proceeding; . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the [parent] is honestly and in good faith engaged in a business to which he is properly adapted, and is making a good faith effort to earn a reasonable income, the award should be based on the amount which defendant is earning when the award is made. To base an award on capacity to earn rather than actual earnings, there should be a finding, based on evidence that the [parent] is failing to exercise his capacity to earn because of a disregard of his marital obligation to provide reasonable support . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.