Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 N.J. 166 - Coll v. Sherry

Coll v. Sherry’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably Jaffee v. United States (1979), Evers v. Dollinger (1984)

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 58 state decisions

2301959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wytupeck v. City of Camden · Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp. · Hager v. Weber · Hartpence v. Grouleff · Fisch v. Manger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] plaintiff must present evidence that there is (1) `a reasonable probability that his injuries will impair his future earning capacity' and (2) `sufficient factual matter upon which the quantum of diminishment can reasonably be determined'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f the prospective consequences may, in reasonable probability be expected to flow from the past harm, plaintiff is entitled to be indemnified for them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “between the inability to foresee what will eventuate in the future and the principle that a plaintiff may not bring successive actions to recover for the results of a tortious personal injury as they unfold.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.