Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 N.J. Super. 291 - Kelley v. Curtiss

29 N.J. Super. 291 - Kelley v. Curtiss’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

4 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 1998 · most notably McAndrew v. Mularchuk (1960), 33 N.J. Super. 575 - Kuzmiak v. Brookchester (1955)

4 district · 29 state decisions

16019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on District of Columbia v. Woodbury · Barnes v. District of Columbia · Kunz v. . City of Troy · Milstrey v. City of Hackensack · Allas v. Borough of Rumson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To be active, there must be a ‘positive, affirmative act.’ Allas v. [Borough of[ Rumson, 115 N. J. L. 593, 595 (E. & A. 1935), supra. In other words, in the sequence of events each of which becomes a proximate cause of the injury, there must be a wrongful act (as distinguished from a mere failure to act) on the part of some municipal officer, agent or servant. The last event in that sequence may be non-action; but that does not render the prior act immune. * * *””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Tort Liability of Municipalities in New Jersey,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.