Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 NM 324 - Young v. Vail

Young v. Vail’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
9
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently December 1992 · most notably Savings Bank of New London v. Santaniello (1943), Damsky v. Zavatt (1961)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 56 state decisions

17019241930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on William Shields v. Robert R Barrow · Carpenter v. Longan · Robbins v. Chicago City · Gormley v. Clark · Noonan v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 1. Whenever the defendant seeks affirmative relief against any party, relating- to or depending upon the contract or transaction upon which the action is brought, or affecting the property to which the action relates, he may, in addition to his answer, file at the same time, or by permission of the court subsequently, a cross-complaint. New parties material to the cause may be brought in by the cross-complaint upon summons issued and served as provided in other cases. The cross-complaint must be served upon the parties affected thereby and on the filing of a cross-complaint the same proceedings may be had as on the original complaint.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The right of trial by jury as it has heretofore existed shall be secured to all and remain inviolate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.