Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 NM 95 - Jordan v. Jordan

Jordan v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
February 1976
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 1976 · most notably Gallegos Ex Rel. Estate of Gallegos v. Franklin (1976), In Re Proposed Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist. (1925)

46 state decisions

200192319301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Chacon · Ex parte Carrillo · State v. Dallas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"• * * The right to appeal from the action of an inferior court must be derived from express constitutional or statutory authority. It must be expressly granted by one or the other. In their absence, no such right exists. The light to appeal to this court is nowhere granted by the Constitution. By section 2 of article 6 the appellate jurisdiction of this court is prescribed, but the right of litigants to appeal and thereby invoke such jurisdiction is not there granted; such being left to the Legislature.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Appeals shall also be allowed by the district court, and entertained by the Supreme Court, from all 'final orders affecting a substantial right made after the entry of final judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.