¶1The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
29 N.Y.S. 1149
Schaad v. Edebohls
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
Decided July 2, 1894
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · decided 1894-07-02
<p>Action by Leocadia Schaad against George M. Edebohls. Purrington & Shannon, for appellant. G. B. Boyd, for respondent.</p>
Decided 1894-07-02