¶1(concurring). I think that there was sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, but am of opinion • that the verdict was excessive in amount, and for that reason a new .trial should be ordered.
29 N.Y.S. 37
Pollock v. Pollock
Decided June 4, 1894
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1929
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Reversed · Decided 1894-06-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →