29 Ohio App. 3d 1 - White v. Nemastil’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2024
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 11 Ohio App. 3d 167 - Mr. Mark Corp. v. Rush, Inc. · 40 Ohio App. 2d 30 - Green, Inc. v. Smith · Sternberg v. Board of Trustees · 134 Ohio St. 171 - Bretz v. Union Central Life Ins. · 53 Ohio App. 2d 248 - Scott v. Cravaack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“were entitled to recover the highest of one of three possible measures of damages: (a) their expectancy damages, (b) their reliance damages, or (c) their restitution damages. They were not entitled to recover under more than one of these three legal theories.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.