29 Ohio App. 3d 321 - State v. Benson’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably 108 Ohio App. 3d 598 - State v. Mays (1996), 172 Ohio App. 3d 666 - State v. Masters (2007)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lee · 13 Ohio App. 3d 27 - State v. Geraldo · 55 Ohio App. 2d 215 - City of Cleveland v. Austin · 136 Ohio St. 477 - State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Day · 44 Ohio App. 2d 318 - Village of Oakwood v. Ferrante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(B) Upon motion made at or prior to the commencement of trial, a person charged with an offense shall be discharged if he is not brought to trial within the time required by sections 2945.71 and 2945.72 of the Revised Code.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The time within which an accused must be brought to trial, or, in the case of felony, to preliminary hearing and trial, may be extended only by the following: “(A) Any period during which the accused is unavailable for' hearing or trial, by reason of other criminal proceedings against him, within or outside the state, by reason of his confinement in another state, or by reason of the pendency of extradition proceedings, provided that the prosecution exercises reasonable diligence to secure his availability; “(B) Any period during which the accused is mentally incompetent to stand trial or during which his mental competence to stand trial is being determined, or any period during which the accused is physically incapable of standing trial; “(C) Any period of delay necessitated by the accused’s lack of counsel, provided that such delay is not occasioned by any lack of diligence in providing counsel to an indigent accused upon his request as required by law; “(D) Any period of delay occasioned by the neglect or improper act of the accused; “(E) Any period of delay necessitated by reason of a plea in bar or abatement, motion, proceeding, or action made or instituted by the accused; “(F) Any period of delay necessitated by a removal or change of venue pursuant to law; “(G) Any period during which trial is stayed pursuant to an express statutory requirement, or pursuant to an order of another court competent to issue such order; “(H) The period of any continuance granted on the ac”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The test for whether a continuance sua sponte or otherwise, may extend the speedy trial limitation is whether the granting of the continuance is journalized and identifies the party to whom the continuance is chargeable. In the case of a sua sponte continuance, the reason therefor must also be indicated in the journal entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.