Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 OHIOST3D 3 - State v. Berndt

State v. Berndt’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

188
cited by 188 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

188 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 188 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Golston (1994), In re S.J.K. (2007)

188 state decisions

59019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wilson · 10 Ohio App. 3d 160 - Village of Oakwood v. Sexton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 188 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a defendant, convicted of a criminal offense, has voluntarily paid the fine or completed the sentence for that offense, an appeal is moot when no evidence is offered from which an inference can be drawn that the defendant will suffer some collateral disability or loss of civil rights from such judgment or conviction.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “substantial stake in the judgment of conviction.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “where a criminal defendant, convicted of a misdemeanor, voluntarily satisfies the judgment imposed on him or her for that offense, an appeal from the conviction is moot unless the defendant has offered evidence from which an inference can be drawn that he or she will suffer some collateral legal disability or loss of civil rights stemming from that conviction.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.