Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 OHIOST3D 53 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

264
cited by 264 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

262 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 264 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State v. Trimble (2009), State v. Zuern (1987)

262 state decisions

107019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jordan v. Arizona · State v. Bayless · State v. Henderson · State v. Gordon · 18 Ohio App. 3d 6 - State v. Cichy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 264 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of a prior offense is such an inflammatory fact that ordinarily it should not be revealed to the jury unless specifically permitted under statute or rule. The undeniable effect of such information is to incite the jury to convict based on past misconduct rather than restrict their attention to the offense at hand.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]here the existence of a prior conviction enhances the penalty for a subsequent offense, but does not elevate the degree thereof, the prior conviction is not an essential element of the subsequent offense, and need not be alleged in the indictment or proved as a matter of fact.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen existence of a prior conviction does not simply enhance the penalty but transforms the crime itself by increasing its degree, the prior conviction is an essential element of the crime and must be proved by the state.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.