Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Okla. 216 - Hesler v. Coldron

Hesler v. Coldron’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
6
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1990

14 state decisions

70191119201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lynn v. Allen · Kerr v. Hitt · Railton v. Lauder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No legal notice, advertisement, or publication of any kind required or provided by any of the laws of the state of Oklahoma to be published in a| newspaper, shall have any force or.effect as such, unless the same be published in a newspaper of the county having general circulation therein, and which newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said county during the period of 52 consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the notice or advertisement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It had a circulation of from 205 to 215, among bankers, merchants, lawyers, real estate agents, insurance agents, wholesale merchants, hardware merchants, physicians, and almost every class of business in the county. That it circulated in almost every town in the county, including Jones, Oklahoma City, Edmond, Luther, Harrah, and Spencer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.