Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Okla. 698 - Fortune v. Parks

Fortune v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 1941
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1941

7 state decisions

301911192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wade v. Mitchell · Neiswender v. James · Whitney v. Harris · Westbrook v. Schmaus · Eckert v. McBee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The record shall be made up from the petition, the process, return, the pleadings subsequent thereto, reports, verdicts, orders, judgments and all material acts and proceedings of the court. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.