Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 PACOMMW 131 - Hoyman v. Commonwealth

Hoyman v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1997

7 state decisions

30197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Philadelphia Life Insurance v. Commonwealth · Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board · Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & Revenue · Stair v. Commonwealth · State ex rel. Rheinfrank v. Gienow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that the Commonwealth has waived its immunity to quiet title actions before the Board cannot be construed as a waiver of immunity in any other forum. ‘Where a State through its Legislature consents to be sued, the modes, terms and conditions of the statute conferring such privilege . . . must be strictly construed and followed [Citations omitted.]’ Land Holding Corporation v. Board of Finance & Review, 388 Pa. 61, 65 , 130 A.2d 700, 703 (1957).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Suits which, seek to compel affirmative action on the part of state officials or to obtain money damages or to recover property from the Commonwealth are within the rule of immunity; suits which simply seek to restrain state officials from performing affirmative acts are not within the rule of immunity. (Emphasis in original.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.