Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 R.I. 71

69 A 292

Arnold v. Regan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 27, 1908

Supreme Court of Rhode Island · decided 1908-03-27

<p>(1) Motion for Jury Trial.</p> <p>C. P. A., § 799, provides: "If a matter of fact be in controversy, either party (in a probate appeal) may, at any time before the assignment-day, claim a jury trial by notice in writing filed with the clerk of the superior court.” Prior to assignment-day appellant filed a motion that the cause “be assigned for jury trial”:—</p> <p>Held, that it was a sufficient compliance with the statute, it appearing that matters of fact were in controversy.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Heard on exceptions of appellants, and sustained · Decided 1908-03-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1929

3 state decisions

10190819101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 This is an appeal from the decree of a Probate Court, in which the appellants filed with the clerk of the Superior Court, three days before the assignment-day of the case, the following paper:

*72 John I. Devlin, for appellants. Edward DeV. O’Connor, for appellees.
“Providence, Sc. Superior Court.
“ October 2, A. D. 1907.
“ Thomas Arnold et ais., vs. “ John H. Regan, Admr., et als.
In the above entitled cause the appellants move that the ' same be assigned for jury trial.
“ John I. Devlin,
Applts. Atty.”

¶2 We think this was a sufficient compliance with section 799, C. & P. A., and entitled the appellants to a jury trial of their appeal, matters of fact being in controversy, as appears from the reasons of appeal.

¶3 A motion is a request to the court to grant the mover some right which he claims. It is a notification that he considers himself entitled to what he asks. The statute prescribes no definite form in which such notice shall be given. Any written words which convey the idea that the supposed right is insisted upon are enough. The object of the statute is to secure a jury trial of controverted matters of fact to- any party who makes known his desire for it in writing at the proper .place and time.

¶4 The appellants’ exception must be sustained and the cause remitted to the Superior Court for jury trial.

/29/ri/71 · .json · Public domain