¶1I concur as to what is said of the Alabama Act. I think that possession by the mortgagor, after breach of condition, was a fraud as to any subsequent creditor without notice, which required explanation, and in this case I have not perceived any explanation which should have satisfied the jury.
29 S.C.L. 556
Fishburne v. Kunhardt
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 15, 1844
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1844-01-15
jBe/bre-RicHARDSON, J. Charleston, October Term, 1843. This was an action of trover, to recover the value of four negroes.
Decided 1844-01-15