Beers v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1950
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Yakus v. United States · Bowles v. Willingham · Bowles v. Wheeler · Henderson v. Burd · Bowles v. Nu Way Laundry Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Emergency Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court upon review of judgments and orders of the Emergency Court of Appeals, shall have exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of any regulation or order issued under section 2, of any price schedule effective in accordance with the provisions of section 206, and of any provision of any such regulation, order, or price schedule. Except as provided in this section, no court, Federal, State, or Territorial, shall have jurisdiction or power to consider the validity of any such regulation, order, or price schedule, or to stay, restrain, enjoin, or set aside, in whole or in part, any provision of this *Page 733 Act authorizing the issuance of such regulations or orders, or making effective any such price schedule, or any provision of any such regulation, order, or price schedule, or to restrain or enjoin the enforcement of any such provision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It has been held in many cases that power to consider the validity of any regulation or order of the Office of Price Administration is solely vested in the Emergency Court of Appeals. Henderson v. Burd, 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 515 , 146 A.L.R. 714 ; Bowles v. Meyers, 4 Cir., 149 F.2d 440 ; Bowles v. Wheeler, 9 Cir., 152 F.2d 34 ; Bowles v. Nu Way Laundry [Co.], 10 Cir., 144 F.2d 741 . And the exclusive jurisdiction of said court applies not only in the case of a regulation of general applicability but also in the case of an individual order. Bowles v. Willingham, supra [ 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 ]; Yakus v. United States, supra [ 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.