29 So. 3d 1288 - Guillory v. Guillory’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Except as otherwise provided by law, a valid and final judgment is conclusive between the same parties, except on appeal or other direct review, to the following extent: [[Image here]] (3) A judgment in favor of either the plaintiff or the defendant is conclusive, in any subsequent action between them, with respect to any issue actually litigated and determined if its determination was essential to that judgment.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 110 So. 3d 1289 - Hindelang v. Hindelang · 95 So. 3d 1152 - Vincent v. Vincent

2. “In an action for divorce under Civil Code Article 102 or 103, in an action for determination of incidental matters under Civil Code Article 105, in an action for contributions to a spouse’s education or training under Civil Code Article 121, and in an action for partition of community property and settlement of claims between spouses under R.S. 9:2801, the judgment has the effect of res judicata only as to causes of action actually adjudicated.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 113 So. 3d 274 - Olsen v. Olsen

3. “The recipient of a rehabilitative or other fixed-duration periodic award may also seek to have it modified or extended under this Article.... The court should make the determination whether periodic support will be modified or terminated based on the changed circumstances of either party.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 95 So. 3d 1152 - Vincent v. Vincent