Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 So. 3d 541 - James v. a & B BUILDERS

29 So. 3d 541 - James v. a & B BUILDERS’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. · 537 So. 2d 328 - Hall v. McDonald Insulation · 943 So. 2d 449 - Roussell v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. · 822 So. 2d 675 - Guidry v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. · 729 So. 2d 689 - Loup v. LA. STATE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The obligation of the employer to furnish such care, services, treatment, drugs, and supplies, whether in state or out of state, is limited to the reimbursement determined to be the mean of the usual and customary charges for such care, services, treatment, drugs, and supplies, as determined under the reimbursement schedule annually published pursuant to R.S. 23:1034.2 or the actual charge made for the service, whichever is less.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.