Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 So. 3d 788 - Davis v. State

29 So. 3d 788 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. State · Sellers v. Sanders · 806 So. 2d 1148 - Smith v. State · 582 So. 2d 428 - Luckett v. State · 751 So. 2d 1038 - Richmond v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The notes to section 97-3-65 explain that on June 3, 2003, the Joint Legislative Committee corrected a typographical error in this section by changing section 97 — 3—65(1) (c) to section 97-3-65(2) and renumbering the remaining paragraphs accordingly. Rape, which was previously numbered section 97-3-65(3)(a), was moved to section 97-3-65(4)(a) after the correction. Thus, Davis was correctly indicted for rape in 2001 under section 97 — 3—65(3)(a), which is now located at Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-3-65(4)(a) (Supp.2008).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.