Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 SW2D 489 - McNeese v. Page

McNeese v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1964
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1964

5 state decisions

301930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fievel v. Zuber · Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. Young · Chesapeake & Nashville Ry. v. Speakman · Hodges v. Alexander · Scott v. Jungquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In 10 R.C.L. 835, mention is made of situations where estoppel may be urged against the plea of limitation, as follows: Where an agreement is made ‘that a claim is to abide the issue of a suit on another claim, or any agreement whereby the creditor is lulled into' security and thereby delays action, is held to create an estoppel barring the debtor from relying on the statute.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.