Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 351st Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Neil v. Biggers · Foster v. California · Sumner v. Mata · Webb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime; (2) the witness’s degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of the witness’s prior description of the criminal; (4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the time of the confrontation; (5) and the lapse of time between the alleged act and the time of the confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Santos v. State“(1) any identification prior to the lineup of another person; (2) the identification by photograph of the defendant prior to the lineup; and (3) any failure to identify the defendant on a prior occasion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Santos v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.