Pina v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Reed v. State · Conn v. Gabbert · Robinson v. State · Ex Parte Morrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n actual and significant conflict of interest of the degree requiring reversal exists when `one defendant stands to gain significantly by counsel adducing probative evidence or advancing plausible arguments that are damaging to the cause of a co-defendant whom counsel is also representing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re BLD
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.