Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 S.W.3d 420

State v. Ethridge

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-10-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2016

2 state decisions

Relies on Kinser v. Elkadi · State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Chadwell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-10-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

KERRY L. MONTGOMERY, Judge.

¶1C & M Bonding, Inc. (C & M) appeals from a judgment of $1,000 entered as a result of a bond forfeiture. C & M, as surety, posted a bail bond for Defendant Paul W. Ethridge after he was charged with the felony of passing a bad check.

¶2Subsequently, Defendant failed to appear for his scheduled court date, and the State filed a “Motion for Judgement on Bond Forfeiture.” After notice to the parties, the trial court heard the State’s motion and entered the aforesaid judgment on November 4,1999.

¶3On November 29, 1999, C & M paid the judgment in full. The record indicates the payment was voluntary and not the result of any execution or other judicial coercion. C & M’s notice of appeal was filed on December 9,1999.

¶4The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal alleging that payment of the judgment prevents an appeal. The motion is well taken.

¶5“As a general rule, when a party voluntarily pays a judgment rendered against him, he may not appeal from that judgment.” State ex rel. Highway & Transp. Comm’n v. Chadwell, 735 S.W.2d 96, 98 (Mo.App.1987).1 “When the judgment has been paid, the issue is settled and the question is moot.” Id.An appeal will be dismissed upon the occurrence of an event which renders a decision unnecessary. Id.

¶6C & M does not dispute that the judgment was a voluntary payment. Therefore, the issue is settled and C & M raises questions which are moot.

¶7Appeal dismissed.

PARRISH, P.J., and SHRUM, J., concur.

¶8. "When a defendant pays a judgment after execution or writ of garnishment in aid of execution has issued, courts have generally held that the payment was involuntary.” Kinser v. Elkadi, 654 S.W.2d 901, 903 (Mo. banc 1983).

/29/sw3d/420 · .json · Public domain