Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 Tex. 179

Cordes v. Kauffman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1867

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1867-01-15

<p>Error from Galveston. The case was tried before Hon. E. A.' Palmer, one of the district judges.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1931

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1867-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Smith, J.

¶1The sickness of Mrs. Cordes, on the day of trial before the justice of the peace, as garnishee, was sufficient excuse for not appearing; but we are of opinion the grounds of defense set up in the petition for certiorari are not sufficient to entitle them to the writ of certiorari. They aver that they were not indebted to the defendant in the suit. This would not have entitled them to a discharge, if they had appeared before the justice of the peace and thus testified. It is made the duty of the garnishee to testify as to what he may be indebted to the defendant, or what *181effects of the defendant he may have in his possession, or had at the time of the service of the garnishment, and what credits and effects there are of the defendant in the hands of any other .person, and what person, to the best of his knowledge and belief. (O. & W. Dig., Art. 39.) And if he fail to appear and answer, as directed above, before judgment against the defendant, after calling him, the justice of the peace will render judgment against him for such sums as may be rendered against the defendant. (O. & W. Dig., Art. 40.)

¶2From the repeated rulings of this court, we are of opinion that the petition for certiorari was not sufficient, and that the court did not err in quashing and dismissing the cause. (11 Tex., 259; 6 Tex., 311; 7 Tex., 250; 15 Tex., 316.)

¶3And the judgment is

¶4Aeeirmed.

/29/tex/179 · .json · Public domain