Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 U.S. 111 - Boyce and Henry v. Timothy Edwards

Boyce and Henry v. Timothy Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

29 U.S. 111 · 1830

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
November 1952
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1952 · most notably Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. Jurey (1884), Coghlan v. South Carolina Railroad (1891)

5 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

901830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. Payson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Tlie distinction between an action on a bill, as an accepted bill, and one lounded on a broach of jiromise to accept, seems not to have been adverted to. but the evidence necessary to support, the one or the other is materially different;. To maintain the former, as has been already shown, the promise must be applied to the particular bill alleged In the declaration to have been accepted. !u the latter the evidence niay be of a more general character, and the authority to draw may be collected from circumstances, and extended ro all bills coming’ fairly within the scope of the promise.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ That a letter written within a reasonable time before or after the date of a bill of exchange, describing it in terms not to be mistaken, and promising to accept it, is, if shown to the person who afterwards takes the bill on the credit of the letter, a virtual acceptance binding the person who makes the promise.” Coolidge v. Payson, 2 Wheat. 66 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.