Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 U.S. 205 - Lloyd v. Scott

Lloyd v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

29 U.S. 205 · 1830

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 7 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2021 · most notably Block v. Hirsh (1921), Ewell v. Daggs (1883)

13 federal appellate · 7 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 11 states

10018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on De Wolf v. Johnson · Jackson ex dem. Bartlett v. Henry · Gibson v. Fristoe · Carter's Executor's v. Cutting

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To constitute a loan usury, it is necessary that there should be an agreement betwen the parties for the lender to take a greater profit by way of discount or interest on the amount loaned than after the rate of six dollars for the forbearance of one hundred dollars for one year. It signifies not In what shape the agreed profit upon the money lent is to accrue. It is sufficient that such profit should exceed the legal rate in order to bring the transact ion within the statute. It is also wholly unimportant in what form, by what device, or under, what pretense this reservation of unlawful profit be made, if, according to tlie agreement of the parties, it Is designed as a profit upon the sum advanced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.