Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Va. App. 240 - Acey v. Commonwealth

29 Va. App. 240 - Acey v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 213 Ill. 2d 295 - People v. Carter (2004), 59 Cal. 4th 733 - People v. Whitmer (2014)

35 state decisions

220199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · 14 Va. App. 836 - Branch v. Commonwealth · United States v. Rosenbarger · United States v. Kinsley · 23 Va. App. 394 - Shears v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the location of the items taken, (2) the lapse of time between the takings, (3) the general and specific intent of the taker, (4) the number of owners of the items taken and (5) whether intervening events occurred between the takings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A. It shall be unlawful for (i) any person who has been convicted of a felony ... to knowingly and intentionally possess or transport any firearm or ammunition for a firearm,.... Any person who violates this section shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.... Any person who violates this section by knowingly and intentionally possessing or transporting any firearm and who was previously convicted of any other felony within the prior 10 years shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of two years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`[a]n appellate court must discard all evidence of the accused that conflicts with that of the Commonwealth and regard as true all credible evidence favorable to the Commonwealth and all fair inferences reasonably deducible therefrom.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.