29 Va. App. 96 - Penrod v. Penrod’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 4 Va. App. 173 - Fry v. Schwarting · Schweider v. Schweider · 14 Va. App. 270 - Frey v. Frey · 18 Va. App. 816 - Rogers v. Yourshaw · 19 Va. App. 265 - Jones v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Wife admitted staying at Hardman’s house three or four times a week over a period of years, sleeping in the same room and sometimes in the same bed. Wife also admitted that she kept numerous items of personalty, including clothing, at Hardman’s home. Hardman and wife vacationed together, usually at Hardman’s expense. Hardman gave wife gifts, including a diamond ring. While wife testified that the relationship with Hardman was not sexual, other evidence ... indicated that Hardman and wife were involved in a long-term intimate and monogamous relationship. Wife admitted in her deposition that she consciously caused breaks in the time she stayed at Hardman’s home because of the “sixty consecutive days” requirement in the parties’ agreement. 4”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.