Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 WASHAPP 565 - State v. Saltarelli

State v. Saltarelli’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ristaino v. Ross · Soblen v. United States · Alford v. State · West Virginia ex rel. Sublett v. Adams · 36 Wash. 2d 367 - State v. Goebel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “only insofar as it reflects upon the defendant's motives or intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.