Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Wash. App. 629 - State v. Pouncey

29 Wash. App. 629 - State v. Pouncey’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 87 Wash. 2d 363 - State v. Newton · 63 Ohio St. 2d 288 - State v. Byrd · State v. Buckalew · State v. Cross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “should not through word or demeanor, either directly or indirectly, communicate to the defendant or defense counsel that a plea agreement should be accepted or that a guilty plea should be entered.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the appropriate appellate function is to scrutinize the available record carefully to determine whether or not the judge's presence and/or involvement [in the plea negotiations] affected the voluntariness of the defendant's plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.